United States v. Big Leggins

Good Law
289 F. App'x 214
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 2008No. 08-30003California799 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

John F. Big Leggins, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of arson under 18 U.S.C. § 81 and § 1153(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Big Leggins pleaded guilty to the arson of a vacant house. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court determined that the vacant house constituted a “structure” under U.S.S.G. § 2K1.4 and applied a eorresponding base offense level of 20. The district court reviewed and discussed the guidelines range, which was 24-30 months imprisonment, and analyzed the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors. The district court then sentenced Big Leggins to 24 months of imprisonment. Big Leggins appeals the district court’s evidentiary rulings, guidelines calculation, and sentence.

I.

In this case, the district court determined that the vacant house was a “structure” other than a dwelling and, accordingly, assigned a base offense level of 20. We agree with this determination.

We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error. United States v. Kimbrew, 406 F.3d 1149, 1151 (9th Cir. 2005). We review the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.