Armenta-Aguirre

Armenta-Aguirre v. Mukasey

Good Law
289 F. App'x 982
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 2008No. 07-75004California251 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 27, 2007 decision denying petitioner’s motion to reopen and reconsider.

To the extent petitioner seeks review of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider, we have reviewed the record and the petitioner’s response to this court’s May 19, 2008 order to show cause, and we conclude that the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). This petition for review is denied in part.

To the extent petitioner seeks review of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen, the court dismisses this petition in part for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 601 (9th Cir.2006) (concluding that the court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case if a prior adverse discretionary decision was made by the agency).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.