Huizar-Perez

Huizar-Perez v. Mukasey

Good Law
292 F. App'x 538
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 2008No. 07-72800California230 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Victor Manuel Huizar-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to terminate and ordering him removed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of citizenship. Solis-Espinoza v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 1090, 1092 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

Contrary to Huizar-Perez’s contention, the record before us presents no genuine issue of material fact requiring us to transfer this petition for review to district court for a hearing on Huizar-Perez’s claimed derivative United States citizenship. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(5)(A) (where court of appeals determines from the record that no genuine issue of material fact about petitioner’s nationality is presented, court shall decide the claim).

Huizar-Perez’s Mexican birth certificate provides evidence of his foreign birth, gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of alienage, and shifts the burden of proof to Huizar-Perez to establish derivative U.S. citizenship by a preponderance of the evidence. See Scales v. INS, 232 F.3d 1159, 1163…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.