Bank of New York Mellon Corp. False Claims Act Foreign Exchange Litigation ex rel. FX Analytics v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.

Good Law
851 F. Supp. 2d 1190·2012 WL 1071132·2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45558
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2012No. C 11-5683 WHACalifornia6,560 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Alsup, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

INTRODUCTION

In this action for breach of contract and related claims, defendants move to dismiss. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is Granted in part and Denied in part.

STATEMENT

Qui tam plaintiff (or “relator”) FX Analytics, a Delaware general partnership, filed this action under seal in Alameda County Superior Court pursuant to the California False Claims Act (“CFCA”). Under the CFCA, a person with independent knowledge of the facts may bring a qui tam action for and in the name of a political subdivision. The suit is filed under temporary seal and the qui tam plaintiff must immediately notify the Attorney General and disclose all pertinent information in the plaintiffs possession. The Attorney General must then provide similar notice and disclosure to the prosecuting authority of the affected political subdivision. After investigation, the pertinent official or officials may intervene in the qui tam suit and assume control of the action. The qui tam plaintiff may remain a party. State ex rel. Harris v. Pricewaterhouse-Coopers, LLP, 39 Cal.4th 1220, 1228 , 48 Cal.Rptr.3d 144 , 141 P.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.