In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

Good Law
978 F. Supp. 2d 1053
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2013Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVSCalifornia23,033 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Selna, J.

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony (“Daubert Motions”)

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Toyota’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Table of Contents

PART ONE: THE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE.....................................1064

I. Introduction — The St. John Collision.................................1064

II. Admissibility of Expert Opinion Testimony and Reports................1064

III. Motion to Exclude Expert Evidence Regarding Institutional Bias of Investigating Agency.............................................1067

IV. Motions to Exclude Expert Evidence Regarding Medical/Human Factors.........................................................1068

A. Burton .......................................................1068

B. Cassini.......................................................1069

C. Gill..........................................................1070

D. Pierce........................................................1072

E. Polydefkis ....................................................1078

V. Motions to Exclude Expert Evidence Regarding Mechanical Issues/Corrosion in Throttle Body..................................1074

A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.