Villegas

Villegas v. City of Anaheim

Good Law
998 F. Supp. 2d 903·2014 WL 703992·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26246
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2014Case No. SACV 12-02013-CJC(ANx)California2,292 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Carney, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

While responding to a report of a suspected drug dealer with a shotgun outside an apartment complex, officers of the Anaheim Police Department encountered an individual later identified as Bernie Cervantes Villegas at the complex holding a long-barrel gun. After Mr. Villegas refused repeated commands to drop his weapon and then lifted the gun off the ground, Officer Nick Bennallack fired five rounds at Mr. Villegas, striking and killing him. Mr. Villegas’s family 1 filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , asserting excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment and related state law claims. Defendants, the City of Anaheim and the Anaheim Police Department (together, “APD”), former APD Police Chief John Welter, and APD Officer Nick Bennallack (collectively, “Defendants”), filed the instant motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 18 [“Defs.’ MSJ”].) The Court finds that, in light of the information known to the officers and the totality of the circumstances surrounding the rapidly developing incident at the apartment complex, the use of deadly force against Mr. Villegas was objectively reasonable. Defendants’ motion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.