United States v. Rice Growers Ass'n

Good Law
110 F. Supp. 667·1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3138
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1953No. 32880California5,606 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Carter, J.

Defendants were indicted for having wilfully and knowingly conspired together to defraud the United States and the Commodity Credit Corporation, an agency of *668 the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and for having wilfully and knowingly concealed by trick, scheme and device a material fact in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Commodity Credit Corporation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 . Evidence has been introduced by the government, and at the conclusion of this phase of the trial, each of the defendants has moved, under Rule 29(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., for a judgment of acquittal.

Each of these motions is urged upon the same two grounds. It is argued that the evidence offered by the government can not, as a matter of law, establish the guilt of the defendants of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. The other ground is the contention that the facts which the government seeks to prove in this case have been conclusively determined in favor of the defendants in a prior adjudication of this court and are, as between the government and these defendants, res judicata. The prior adjudication to which reference is made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.