P.
P. v. Parsons CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 5/30/13 P. v. Parsons CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(San Joaquin) ----
THE PEOPLE, C070946
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SF118460A)
v.
WILLIAM PERCY PARSONS,
Defendant and Appellant.
In this one-issue appeal, defendant William Percy Parsons correctly contends the minute order of sentencing and the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the amount of fines and fees the judge orally imposed at sentencing ($280 total as orally pronounced by the judge instead of the $290 total as recorded by the clerk, the discrepancy being a $10 increase in the amount of the restitution fund collection fee in the written documents). The People disagree. They argue that since the judge…