P.

DISCUSSION

Defendant appealed and, upon his request, this court appointed counsel to

represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979)

1 All further statutory references will be to the Penal Code, unless otherwise noted.

2 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of

the case and no potential arguable issues. Counsel has also requested this court to

undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which

he has not done.

Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have

conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

However, we note a few apparent clerical errors. The abstract of judgment does

not reflect that defendant had a prison prior enhancement (§ 667.5, subd. (b)), and it

indicates that defendant was sentenced to a total of four years in state prison. The court

actually sentenced defendant to two years on count 2, doubled pursuant to the prior strike,

and added one year pursuant to the prison prior, for a total of five years. It is evident that

the superior…