Adam

Adam v. Adam CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2013B237557California3,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 5/30/13 Adam v. Adam CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THOMAS G. ADAM et al., 2d Civil No. B237557 (Super. Ct. No. 1272918) Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

ANDREW M. ADAM,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appellants Thomas G. Adam and his wife Janice Adam1 appeal from a declaratory relief judgment arising from Andrew M. Adam's (Thomas's brother) sale and leaseback of a 321-acre ranch. Thomas argues, among other things, that the trial court erred in finding that Andrew breached no fiduciary duty and was not required to provide a more detailed accounting. We affirm. The Family Ranches In 1990, Thomas's and Andrew's father, William…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.