Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc. v. United States

Good Law
115 F. Supp. 72
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 1953No. 15166California7,002 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Mathes, J.

Certain tank-truck motor carriers of bulk petroleum products, joined by various locals of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouse-men and Helpers, seek by this action to enjoin and annul an order of the In *75 terstate Commerce Commission entered January 12, 1953 in proceeding entitled. “Investigation and Suspension Docket No. 6010 — Petroleum, Los Angeles and El Paso to Arizona and New Mexico.” See 287 I.C.C. 731 (1953).

Jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1336 . See also: Id. §§ 2321-2325, 2284; 49 U.S.C.A. § 17 (9); 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009 ; Am. Trucking Ass’ns v. United States, 1953, 344 U.S. 298, 318-320 , 73 S.Ct. 307 ; United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, 1952, 344 U.S. 33 , 73 S.Ct. 67 .

In the language of the Commission: “By schedules filed to become effective on June 9, 1952, the respondents [rail carriers) proposed reduced rates on refined petroleum products and distillate fuel oils, in tank-car loads, from Los Angeles, Calif. * * * shipping points, and El Paso, Tex., to Phoenix and Tucson, Ariz., and intermediate and related points in Arizona and New Mexico.” Petroleum, Los Angeles and El Paso to Arizona and New Mexico,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.