Morton

Morton v. Spotts CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2013D058640California11,392 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Filed 5/31/13 Morton v. Spotts CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KIM MELANIE MORTON, D058640

Plaintiff and Appellant

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2008-00099933-

CU-OR-EC)

DANA SPOTTS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL and cross-appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego

County, Eddie C. Sturgeon, Judge. Affirmed.

The McMillan Law Firm, Scott A. McMillan and Evan A. Kalooky for Plaintiff

and Appellant.

Thomas/Lucas, Wayne D. Thomas, Timothy D. Lucas and A. Kerry Stack for

Defendant and Appellant. Plaintiff and appellant Kim Melanie Morton owns a dwelling in an older area of

La Mesa. Starting in 2007, when the adjacent homeowner, defendant and cross-appellant

Dana Spotts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.