Lloyd

Filed 5/31/13 Lloyd v. Hardesty CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

ANDREA LLOYD,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A135472

v. NINA HARDESTY, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG10524933) Defendant and Appellant.

Nina Hardesty also known as Nina Wax (Wax) appeals from a restraining order invoking the provisions of the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS). She contends that the trial court lacked sufficient evidence to issue a CLETS order. We reverse and remand the matter for further proceedings. We have previously set forth the facts underlying this matter in the parties‘ prior appeal, Lloyd v. Hardesty (January 12, 2012, A130306/A130308 [nonpub. opn.] (Lloyd I). As set forth in that opinion, this case arose out…