Grancare

Grancare v. Horton CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2013B241363California3,766 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rothschild, J.

Filed 5/31/13 Grancare v. Horton CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

GRANCARE, LLC, B241363

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC450260) v.

MARK B. HORTON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Barbara M. Scheper, Judge. Affirmed. ______ Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, Scott J. Kiepen, Matthew Clark and Katrina A. Pagonis for Plaintiff and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Julie Weng-Gutierrez, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer M. Kim and Betty Chu-Fujita, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents. ______ Grancare, LLC, doing business as Arbor View Rehabilitation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.