Grant

Grant v. Smyth

Good Law
123 F. Supp. 771·46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 704·1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3083
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1954Civ. No. 31582California2,360 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hamlin, J.

This is an action by plaintiff, as executor of his wife’s will, to recover an alleged overpayment of estate tax. The facts are not in dispute and were stipulated at the trial.

Mrs. Grant purchased fourteen annuities in 1938 and 1939 aggregating in cost $390,000. The insurance companies agreed to pay to Mr. and Mrs. Grant jointly, during Mrs. Grant’s lifetime, $20,744.52 per year. After the death of Mrs. Grant, Mr. Grant if he survived was to receive the same amount per year for the remainder of his life. These contracts were “single premium nonparticipating and non-refundable joint and survivorship annuity contracts.” At the time of the purchase Mrs. Grant was about 58 years of age and Mr. Grant was about 59.

Mrs. Grant died on March 2, 1947, at the age of 67, leaving Mr. Grant surviving her. An estate tax return was filed which included these annuities in the gross estate of Mrs. Grant and valued them at $160,399.45. This was based on a table of mortality basis as provided in the Treasury Regulations when there are no comparable contracts for purposes of valuation. , The government took the position that there were comparable contracts and re-valued the annuities at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.