Bourns

Bourns v. Edcliff Instruments

Good Law
125 F. Supp. 503·103 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 369·1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2695
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 1954Civ. No. 14764California1,339 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Yankwich, J.

Action for infringement of patent No. 2,515,981, issued to M. E. Bourns on July 18, 1950. The defendants have denied infringement and have attacked the validity of the patent. ' No claim of invention by them is asserted by the defendants. Their challenge of the validity of the patent is based on claimed anticipation.

I

The Validity of the Patent in Suit.

The issues, as narrowed by the proof, concern the validity of the single claim of the patent, which reads:

The invention is denominated an “adjustable resistor”, and is known in industry as a “potentiometer.”

The inventor has illustrated his invention in two embodiments. (See illustrations.) The validity of the claim is challenged. The challenge lacks merit.

*505

A potentiometer is an electro-mechanical. device containing a resistance element that is contacted by a movable slider. (See F. E. Dole, Potentiometers in “Components Handbook,” ed. by John F. Blackburn, 1949.) The patented device is a linear type.

The problem which confronted the art is stated in the specifications in this manner:

The problem was met by the inventor by providing (a) an adjustable resistor of simple structure that would respond with precision to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.