P.

People v. Beltran

Bad Law
157 Cal. Rptr. 3d 503·2013 Cal. LEXIS 4696·56 Cal. 4th 935·2013 WL 2372307·301 P.3d 1120
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 3, 2013S192644California9,376 words

Opinion

Opinion

Corrigan, J.

Here we clarify what kind of provocation will suffice to constitute heat of passion and reduce a murder to manslaughter. The Attorney General argues the provocation must be of a kind that would cause an ordinary person of average disposition to kill. We disagree. Nearly 100 years ago, this court explained that, when examining heat of passion in the context of manslaughter, the fundamental “inquiry is whether or not the defendant’s reason was, at the time of his act, so disturbed or obscured by some passion ... to such an extent as would render ordinary men of average disposition liable to act rashly or without due deliberation and reflection, and from this passion rather than from judgment.” (People v. Logan (1917) 175 Cal. 45, 49 [ 164 P. 1121 ] (Logan).) The proper standard focuses upon whether the person of average disposition would be induced to react from passion and not from judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant Tare Nicholas Beltran and Claire Joyce Tempongko met in November 1998 and began dating. In January 1999, defendant moved into the San Francisco apartment Tempongko shared with her nine-year-old son J.N. and her younger daughter. J.N. called defendant “dad.” In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.