Majeske

Majeske v. DRS Technolgies CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 2013B236760California5,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Filed 6/3/13 Majeske v. DRS Technolgies CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

STEVEN MAJESKE, B236760

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC429031) v.

DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David L. Minning, Judge. Affirmed.

Fersguson Case Orr Paterson, Wendy C. Lascher and Meghan B. Clark; Law Office of Vida M. Holguin and Vida M. Holguin for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gordon & Rees San Francisco and Don Willenburg; Gordon & Rees Los Angeles, Stephen E. Ronk, Anthony J. Bellone and Jennifer L. Ghozland for Defendants and Respondents. ________________________________ In 2009,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.