Flakice Corp. v. Liquid Freeze Corp.

Good Law
130 F. Supp. 471·106 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 12·1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3383
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1955No. 31060California9,456 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Murphy, J.

This is a patent case involving machines for the production of arched shaped ice wafers. These wafers are produced by freezing a thin sheet of ice-on a rigid rotating cylindrical drum. The cylindrical shape of the freezing-surface produces the arched shape provided the ice can be removed without, splintering or scraping it off. If the-bond which holds the ice sheet to the-drum can be broken before the ice is-broken into splinters the ice comes off im wafers. It is the method of removing; *473 the ice from the drum which is important Rere.

Plaintiffs assert infringement of two patents — Short patent 2,310,468, dated February 9, 1943 and Raver patent 2,-308,541, dated January 19,. 1943. Both -the Short and Raver patents are owned by the Flakice- Corporation and licensed to the York Corporation. The defendant manufactures and sells under a license of the Lees-Lessard patent No. 2,585,020, ■dated February Í2, 1952.

In addition to pleading non-infringement the defendant alleges that the patents are invalid. They assert (a) that the patents are not a step beyond the prior art which achieves the dignity of invention; (b) prior use; and (c) that the claims are invalid.as-stating a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.