West

West v. Conrad

Good Law
92 F. Supp. 291·1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2515
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1950Civil A. No. 8207-YCalifornia1,176 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Yankwich, J.

The above entitled cause came on regularly for trial on October 12 and 13, 1948, plaintiff, Mabel E. West, appearing by her attorneys, and the defendants, W. E. Conrad and Howard F. Conrad, appearing by their attorneys, and evidence having been duly introduced by each of the parties, and the Court having heard the testimony, and having examined the proofs offered by the respective parties and the cause having been submitted to the Court for decision, and the written memorandum of decision having been rendered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff under date of October 16, 1948, now therefore, the Court makes the following

Findings of Fact

I

The jurisdiction of this Court arises under and by virtue of the provisions of Section 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, and as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1895, which section of said act specifically confers jurisdiction upon this Court to hear and determine this matter.

II

That at all times in the complaint mentioned, and in the amended complaint mentioned, the plaintiff and defendants were residents of the County of Los Angeles, and that all parties hereto are citizens of the State of California residing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.