Lysfjord

Lysfjord v. Flintkote Co.

Good Law
135 F. Supp. 672·1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2636
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 1955Civ. No. 14350California1,658 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Tolin, J.

This action was commenced against many defendants. It appears on the Court docket as Elmer Lysfjord et al. versus L. D. Reeder Co. of San Diego et al. As all defendants except The Flintkote Company have been dismissed from this action, the Court refers to the case as captioned herein, The Flintkote Com'pany being the only defendant now before the Court. Plaintiffs sued to recover damages sustained by them because of defendants’ violation of the antitrust laws. Before trial, all defendants (except The Flintkote Company) collectively paid plaintiffs $20,000 as consideration for a covenant not to sue upon the claim asserted in the complaint.

The Flintkote Company did not obtain such a covenant' and at the beginning of the trial it stipulated that the facts relating to said covenant not to sue would be withheld from the attention of the jury. Plaintiffs and The Flintkote Company stipulated that without prejudice to the right of either party to appeal or otherwise attack an adverse ruling, the Court would determine the effect upon the final judgment of the partial settlement of the case memorialized by the covenant not to sue.

The case was tried before a jury which rendered a general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.