Cox

Cox v. English-American Underwriters

Good Law
142 F. Supp. 824·1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3209
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 1956Civ. No. 7037California3,336 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Halbert, J.

Plaintiff originally brought this action in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Shasta, on a fire insurance policy seeking to recover the loss, which he alleges he sustained as the result of a fire. Defendant had the case removed to this Court on the jurisdictional basis of diversity of citizenship. Defendant moved this Court for a summary judgment. Argument on this motion was heard by this Court in due course, and the motion was submitted for decision after counsel, at the Court’s request, filed memoranda in support of their positions. Thereafter, on a date subsequent to the submission of the motion for summary judgment, but before a decision had been rendered, plaintiff moved this Court for leave to file a supplemental complaint pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. This Court ordered this latter motion submitted, and announced that it would consider and decide both motions at the same time.

The motion for summary judgment, which was made by the defendant, is predicated on the single proposition that there had not been arbitration as to the dispute between the parties as to the actual cash value or the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.