Ex parte Carlson

Good Law
94 F. Supp. 18·1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2046
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 1950Nos. 12491, 12492, 12503, 12505California1,832 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

In the above entitled habeas corpus proceedings which were initiated to secure the release on bail of several aliens held without bail by the immigration authorities pending final determination of their cases, an order to show cause was issued and a return thereto filed by the Attorney General. The petitioners, through oral argument and by means of briefs presented to the court, contend that the return to the order to show cause is insufficient and that they are entitled to their discharge on the state of the record as a matter of law. The return contained a copy of the warrant of arrest wherein the petitioners were retained in custody under authority of Section 156, Title 8 U.S.C.A., as amended by the Internal Security Act of 1950 (U.S. Congressional Service pp. 3740-3762). Said section as amended in part reads as follows : “ * * * Pending final determination of the deportability of any alien taken into custody under warrant of the Attorney General, such alien may, in the discretion of the Attorney General (1) be continued in custody; or (2) be released under bond in the amount of not less than $500, with security approved by the Attorney General; or (3) be released on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.