Volpe

United States v. Volpe

Good Law
943 F. Supp. 1211·1996 WL 629911·1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19690
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 1996No. CR. 92-0034-FMSCalifornia242 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Smith, J.

ORDER VACATING ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1994

The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

1. On January 18, 1994, a federal grand jury returned a Second Superseding Indictment charging defendant Santo Volpe with violations of False ERISA Statements ( 18 U.S.C. § 1027 ) and Mail Fraud ( 18 U.S.C. § 1341 ).

2. On September 6, 1994, then United States District Court Judge Barbara Caul-field, in a written Order, granted defendant Volpe’s motion to dismiss the ERISA counts *1212 but denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the Mail Fraud counts.

3. On October 14,1994, the United States timely filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order. The government motion is presently pending.

4. Upon the resignation of Judge Caul-field, the case was reassigned to this Court.

5. On May 27, 1996, defendants Santo Volpe and American Beverage Company executed plea agreements before this Court. As part of the plea agreement, the defendants and the government stipulated to the applicability of the ERISA statute to ^the instant criminal proceedings (the issue addressed in the September 6, 1994 Order). In addition, the parties have jointly moved this Court to vacate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.