Blaylock

United States v. Blaylock

Good Law
159 F. Supp. 874·1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2704
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1958Civ. No. 36569California1,370 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Roche, J.

The United States of America brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1345 (1952) against defendants Joseph Blaylock, Guy Head, and Orleans Veneer and Lumber Co., praying for: (1) a permanent injunction against Blaylock, restraining him from entry upon certain land in the Klamath National Forest and from logging the timber thereon; (2) a deed from Blaylock to plaintiff of this same land and judgment that the land belongs to plaintiff free of any liens; and (3) reformation of Homestead Patent No. 822,606 to contain a corrected legal description of the land patented under it.

The record discloses that, prior to 1921, John Patterson occupied certain land (hereafter called Parcel 1) in the Klamath National Forest, Siskiyou County, California, as a homestead under entry number 02655 and applied for a patent covering the land. On September 13, 1921, plaintiff issued to John Patterson Homestead Patent No. 822,606, which patent contained the following description intended by plaintiff to cover Parcel 1:

The evidence shows that the description contained in Homestead Patent No. 822,-606, because of mistake, did not cover Parcel 1 but instead covered another parcel of land in the Klamath…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.