Biazevich

Biazevich v. Becker

Good Law
161 F. Supp. 261·41 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2782·1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2359
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1958Civ. No. 126California1,415 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Yankwich, J.

This cause came on to be heard upon a complaint of Paul Biazevich et al. requesting that defendants Henry W. Becker, Regional Director of the Twenty-First Region of the National Labor Relations Board, George H. O’Brien, a Board attorney, and Karl W. Filter, a Board field examiner, be ordered to produce before defendant Wallace E. Royster, a trial examiner of the Board, before whom a hearing of the National Labor Relations Board in unfair labor practice cases is being held and in' which complainants are respondents, certain specified documents pursuant to the terms of certain subpenas duces tecum issued during the hearing by said Royster; that they be restrained from further participation in the unfair labor practice cases until such documents are produced; that defendant Royster be enjoined from closing the hearing in the unfair labor practice cases until said subpenas have been fully complied with; and that Section 102.87 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, as applied in these cases, be declared unconstitutional. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Upon consideration of the aforesaid complaint, motion to dismiss, mem-oranda of law and oral argument of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.