Crisp
United States v. Crisp
Opinion
lead Opinion
Wanger, J.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DEFENDANT WANDA CRISP’S MOTION TO DISMISS; CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the Court on various motions and counter-motions of the parties for summary judgment. Plaintiff originally filed four complaints. The first was against Sequoia Property and Equipment Limited Partnership (filed 1/22/97); the second against Hyper-Jean Property and Equipment Limited Partnership (filed 1/30/98); the third against Wanda Jean Crisp, Hyper-Jean Property and Equipment Limited Partnership, Leader Federal Bank for Savings, Bankers Trust Company of California, and Mid-Valley Lenders (filed 10/14/98); and the fourth against Gilbert Mark Crisp, Rhonda Crisp, Sequoia Property and Equipment, and Washington Mutual Bank Inc. (filed 10/19/98). All four cases were consolidated for all purposes on August 6,1999.
The second amended complaint alleges two claims. (Doc. 61, No. 98-6188) First, Plaintiff requests the tax assessments against Gilbert Mark Crisp and Rhonda Jean Crisp from 1988 and 1989 be reduced to judgment. *549 (Doc. 61, No. 98-6188 at 3-4) Second, Plaintiff seeks to set aside the…