Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. v. Perkin-Elmer Corp.

Good Law
2000 WL 133749·190 F.R.D. 644
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2000No. C-97-04203 CRB/EAICalifornia2,793 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Infante, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND CM L.R. 16-9(b) RESPONSE CHART

I. INTRODUCTION

On December 20, 1999, The Perkin-Elmer Corporation (“Perkin-Elmer”) moved, pursuant to Civil L.R. 16 — 6(d) and 16-9(c), for leave to amend its Civil L.R. 16 — 9(b) Response Chart (“Response Chart”) to add Japanese Patent Publication No. 5060698A, citing “excusable subsequent discovery” of this additional prior art reference (“the Motion”). In support of the Motion, Perkin-Elmer submitted the Declaration of Edward R. Reines (“Reines Deck”), with exhibits, and the Declaration of Michael W. Hunkapiller (“Hunka-piller Deck”). With its opposition to Perkin-Elmer’s Motion, Amersham Pharmacia Bio-tech, Inc. (“Amersham”) submitted a declaration from Jeffrey W. Guise (“the Guise Deck”), with exhibits. Having reviewed and considered all of the above, the Court GRANTS the Motion, for the reasons set forth below.

II. BACKGROUND

In November 1997 Amersham sued Per-kin-Elmer for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,688,648 (“the ’648 patent”). On September 17, 1998, after receiving from Am-ersham its Civil L.R. 16-9(a) Claim Chart, Perkin-Elmer served its Civil L.R. 16 — 9(b) Response Chart identifying those prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.