Gardner

Gardner v. Wilson

Good Law
959 F. Supp. 1224
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 1997No. CV 96-1137-JGD(RC)California3,472 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Davies, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; and (2) defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing with prejudice the Complaint and action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on the parties.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable John G. Davies, District Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

BACKGROUND

I

On February 15, 1996, plaintiff Ronald W. Gardner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Sled a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.