Moore

Moore v. United States

Good Law
2000 WL 994238·194 F.R.D. 665·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12019
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2000No. C99-3211 MEJCalifornia378 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

James, J.

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S PLEADINGS FILED ON JULY 3, 2000; ORDER PRECLUDING PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER FILING OF PLEADINGS IN CASE HEREIN.

On June 29, 2000, the Court dismissed with prejudice Plaintiffs action in its entirety and vacated all proceedings. Additionally, the Court struck from the record Plaintiffs June 8, 2000 supplemental pleading entitled “FOR THE CLAIM OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE DAMAGES WITH THE FAULT OF THE ANSWER BY THE VASSALEES IS WITH THE CORPORATION OF THE CASE: C-99-03211 (M.E.J.) BY THE ACT OF THE REGISTRATION Z 134 319 169 OF THE JUNE-1, 2000”, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f).

On July 3, 2000, Plaintiff filed a supplemental pleading entitled, “FOR THE AFFI-, DAVIT OF THE SUPPORT OF THE CLAIM OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE DAMAGES WITH THE FAULT OF THE ANSWER BY THE VASSALEES IS WITH THE CORPORATION OF THE CASE: C-99-03211 (M.H.P.) BY THE ACT OF THE REGISTRATION Z 134 319 168 OF THE JULY 3, 2000”. Plaintiff also lodged with the Clerk of the Court pleadings entitled (1) “FOR THE WRIT OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE DAMAGES WITH THE FAULT OF THE ANSWER BY THE VASSALEES IS WITH THE CORPORATION OF THE CASE: C-99-03211 (M.H.P.) BY THE ACT OF THE REGISTRATION: Z 132…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.