United States v. 237,500 Acres of Land, more or less, in the counties of Inyo & Kern, State of California

Good Law
236 F. Supp. 44·1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8218
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 1964Civ. Nos. 311 ND, 3472 JWCCalifornia6,070 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Several pumice placer mining claims in each of the above cases were consolidated for trial and were tried together, without a jury.

The claims involved in Case No. 3472-JWC are all located in T.23-S, R.40-E, MDB&M, and are known as the “Brown Group.” The claims of that group, concerning which evidence was offered and admitted as to the value and title, are “Tired Boy,” a 160 acre claim; “White Gold;” a group involving two claims of 20 acres each, overlapping one another; “White Eagle No. 2,” 20 acres; “Gray Boy,” 20 acres; and “White Eagle Reserve,” a 160 acre claim.

The claims involved in Case No. 311-ND are all located in T.21-S, R.38-E, MDB&M, and are known as the “Donna-Gill” claims. Those claims upon which evidence was offered and admitted as to value and ownership are “Donna No. 3 and No. 4” and “Ray Gill No. 31.”

OWNERSHIP

[Brown Group]

The United States stipulated with defendant American Pumice Company that on the date the Declaration of Taking was filed in Case No. 3472-JWC, the “Brown Group,” except “White Eagle Reserve,” were owned by the American Pumice Company.

*46 The only one putting on any case for title or valuation or appearing as a party in interest at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.