The libel brought in the court below by the appellees was for the recovery of damages alleged to have been sustained by them by the negligent stowing and transporting of a consignment of 88 casks of olives from Antwerp, Belgium, to San Francisco, 8 barrels of which were alleged to have been delivered to the appellees by the appellant in a greatly damaged condition. The court below found the facts to be as alleged in the libel, and accordingly entered a decree for damages.

The sole point made on the appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to warrant the findings. The case shows that the olives were shipped at the port of Sevilla, Spain, on the ship Lister, to be transshipped at Antwerp on board the Japanese steamship Soyo Maru. At Antwerp they were received on board the Soyo Maru, and stowed under the direction of a marine surveyor named Baines, who was a witness in the cause, and who testified, among other things, that when the olives were received by the appellant they were in good condition, and, in his opinion, fit for shipment. The witnesses are not agreed as to whether the olives were stowed in one, two, or three tiers; but it is undisputed that.upon the casks of olives were placed eight tiers of champagne in cases, in mixed pints and quarters, above which were stowed cases of matches, four tiers high, with some straw covers for bottles, and, according to one of the witnesses, some vermouth. In his deposition Baines says:

The pregnant fact is that the superincumbent weight was too great for all of the casks of olives to withstand it; for the undisputed fact is that eight of those casks had some of their staves flattened, thereby loosening them from the heads, resulting in the loss of the brine, and the consequent damage to the olives sued for.

We think the evidence sufficient to sustain the findings, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.