Schroeder

Schroeder v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Good Law
326 F. Supp. 594·170 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 62·1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13622
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 22, 1971Civ. A. No. 67-869-PHCalifornia1,178 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hall, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, is the owner of United States Letters Patent 3,240,643, entitled “Method and Apparatus For Making A Flexible Insulated Duct” (hereinafter referred to as the “Method Patent”) issued to plaintiff, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, as assignee of the coinventors, plaintiffs Clifford A. Schroeder and Quentin L. Clark on March 15, 1966. All claims of the Method Patent in suit cover either a method or apparatus for making a flexible insulated duct.

2. Plaintiff, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, is the owner of United States Letters Patent No. 3,216,459, entitled “Flexible Insulated Duct” (hereinafter referred to as “Article Patent”) issued to plaintiff, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, as assignee of the coinventors plaintiffs, Clifford A. Schroeder and Quentin L. Clark *596 on November 9, 1965. All claims of the Article Patent in suit cover a flexible insulated duct.

3. As of the date of filing the Complaint herein, Plaintiffs Clifford A. Schroeder and Quentin L. Clark, residents of the Central District of California (hereinafter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.