Stebler

Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'n

Good Law
124 C.C.A. 29·205 F. 735·1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1497
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 1913No. 2,232California2,572 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dietrich, J.

The appellant, as the owner of reissue letters patent No. 12.297, granted to Robert Strain December 27, 1904, *736 brought this suit to enjoin alleged infringement. The invention is a machine for grading or assorting fruit with reference to size, and is presently useful chiefly in the orange industry, where, in order to secure a uniform pack, it is necessary that all oranges in a box be practically of the same size. Assortment by hand is too slow and inaccurate, and hence the need of a mechanical device.

The claims alleged to have been infringed are 1 and 10, which are as follows:

Claim 1:

Claim 10:

The defenses are invalidity of the claims, through anticipation of the combination thereby called for, and nonirifringement.

The issue can be more clearly and concisely explained by a reference to the state of the art when the patent was issued. There was at that time in practical use what was commonly known as the California grader, based upon a patent (No. 458,422) granted to J. T. Ish, August 25, 1891. The essential members of this device were (1) a long horizontal roller, with graduated sections or steps, turned down from a large diameter to a smaller one, resembling an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.