Cresset

Cresset v. International Harvester Co. of America

Good Law
206 F. 29
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 1913No. 2,194California2,273 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Wolverton, J.

This was an. action to recover money upon contract. Certain parts of the complaint were stricken out upon motion. Subsequently a demurrer was sustained to the complaint with the clauses thus stricken. Judgment having been rendered in favor of the defendant for its costs and disbursements, the plaintiff brings his.writ of error for review.

Defendant is a manufacturing institution, engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of farming implements and machinery. As such it employs agents in its service for selling its products and collecting from purchasers the sales prices. The complaint sets forth a great deal by way of inducement. Omitting much of such matter, it alleges in substance: That it was the universal practice and custom of the defendant company in South Dakota, at all times mentioned in the complaint and for a long time prior thereto, to pay its collecting agents a bonus or commission over and above the fixed salary stated' in its printed contracts, provided the agent reached a certain standard set by the company, and kept his expenses below a fixed limit. That the company, according to its custom, and for its own special reasons, never incorporated the agreement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.