The J. L. Luckenbach

Good Law
209 F. 142·1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1101
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 1913No. 15,063California354 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dooling, J.

Libelant sues to recover $1,283.02, with interest from the date of the filing of the libel for damages alleged to have been suffered by certain merchandise shipped from New York on the steamship J. L. Luckenbach in good condition and delivered at San Francisco in a damaged condition. The receipt of the merchandise in a good condition and its delivery in a damaged condition are admitted by claimant, but exemption from liability is claimed by reason of thé following provision in the bill of lading:

The proofs on the part of libelant show that some of the merchandise, consisting of various articles of hardware, were received in a badly damaged condition; the damage to some of the articles having been occasioned by breakage and to others by rust. The manner in which the articles were broken is not shown, and the only evidence as to the rust is that it was caused by water. All of the damage shown, having been occasioned by breakage or rust, comes within the exemption in the bill of lading, and libelant cannot recover therefor, without proof that the breakage and rust were due to the negligence of claim *143 ant or his agents. Once it is shown that the damage arose from one of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.