Whiteway

Pennsylvania Casualty Co. v. Whiteway

Good Law
127 C.C.A. 332·210 F. 782·1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2019
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 1914No. 2297California1,035 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1, 2] The burden of the argument of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that *784 tbe evidence overwhelmingly established the fact that Irwin was not a steel man, as he was classified in the policy, and as alleged in the complaint, but was a common laborer, and it ignores the effect of the judgment of the court below, which must be taken as conclusively establishing the contrary, for there was no motion in the court below for a ruling or judgment on that question at the close of the trial, nor does any assignment.of error challenge the finding of the court on the evidence. When an action at law is tried before a jury, their verdict is not subject to review unless there is absence of substantial evidence to sustain it, and even then it is not reviewable unless a request has been made for a peremptory instruction, and an exception taken to the ruling of the court. When a jury is waived, and the cause is tried by the court, the general finding of the court for one or the other of the parties stands as the verdict of a jury, and may not be"reviewed in an appellate court unless the lack of evidence to sustain the finding has been suggested by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.