Ecuadorian Gulf Oil Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Good Law
23 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 368·73 F.R.D. 99·1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11656
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1976No. CV 76-2273-DWWCalifornia821 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Williams, J.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

On July 16, 1976, plaintiff filed its complaint charging defendant Atlantic Rich-field Company with wrongfully converting to its own use a cargo of Ecuadorian oriente crude oil in which plaintiff claims an ownership interest. The defendant did not file an answer, but on October 28, 1976 filed a third-party complaint against Marc Rich & Company, a Swiss corporation, for breach of warranties of title and for indemnity. On November 15, 1976 at 10:01 A.M. plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). On the same day at 5:01 P.M. the defendant and the third-party defendant (hereinafter referred to jointly as defendants) filed a motion for dismissal of the complaint or for summary judgment upon the grounds that (1) the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens requires this court to decline jurisdiction; (2) the complaint fails to join persons whose joinder is required, but over whom this court is unable to obtain jurisdiction; and (3) the Act of State Doctrine precludes judicial inquiry into the acts of the government of Ecuador which are called into question by this lawsuit.

Inasmuch…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.