American-Pacific Const. Co. v. Modern Steel Structural Co.

Good Law
128 C.C.A. 375·211 F. 849·1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1784
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 1914No. 2272California1,685 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Wolverton, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1] Prior to the making of the proposal and its acceptance, the parties had been in negotiation touching the subject-matter thereof in anticipation of defendant entering into a contract with the Richelieu Realty Syndicate for furnishing the iron and steel for its building and setting the same in place; and about the same time the proposal was accepted the contract for such work was entered into between these parties. The fact that such a contract was entered into has its bearing upon the question whether the alleged contract in controversy was ever legally consummated. Indeed, the specifications made part of the alleged contract are the specifications which were a part of the contract between the defendant and the realty syndicate. It is in fact conceded by • the plaintiff, through its president, that the architect’s ■ original plans were incomplete at the time the alleged contract was consummated, and consequently at the time plaintiff began work fabri *853 eating the steel and iron for the structure. Nor were the architectural designs for the general plan of the theater portion of the building made. The theater constituted perhaps one-half of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.