Ex parte Chin Fong

Good Law
213 F. 288·1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 954
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 1914No. 15614California322 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dooeing, J.

The petition shows that petitioner, Chin Fong, who had been a resident of the United States for a number of years, departed for China in November, 1912; that before he left he applied for a preinvestigation as to his status as a merchant, and a certificate was denied him, on the ground that his original entry into this country was surreptitious; that, notwithstanding this denial, the petitioner left the country, and is now endeavoring to reenter as a returning Chinese merchant; that he presents the affidavits of a member of the New York firm to which he claims to belong and of two reputable Americans supporting his claim; that, notwithstanding these facts,'he has been denied admission and ordered deported on the same ground that his preinvestigation certificate was denied, that is to say, because his original entry was surreptitious; that in so deciding the immigration department has exceeded its authority, as that question can only be determined under the exclusion laws by a justice, judge, or commissioner.

This, briefly stated, is the body of the present petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To this petition a demurrer has been interposed. I am of the opinion that the demurrer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.