Cohen

Cohen v. United States

Good Law
214 F. 23·1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1098
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 1914No. 2339California2,068 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1] It is assigned as error that the court overruled the demurrer to the indictment, and it is contended that the indictment is fatally defective in that the words “trial” and “issue” were used in referring to the hearing before the United States commissioner, in which the alleged perjured testimony was given, for the reason that a United States commissioner is without jurisdiction to try any issue between the United States and the person charged with crime. We find no merit in the contention. The indictment sufficiently shows what the, proceeding was. The plaintiff in 'error was in no way prejudiced by the fact that the indictment against him described the proceeding before the United States commissioner as the trial of an issue. He was well aware of the nature of the proceeding, and had advised the witness Esther Wood as to the testimony she should give at the examination. In a sense there are “issues” to be tried on such a preliminary examination, the issues whether a crime has been committed, and whether there is reasonable ground to believe that the defendant committed it, and these issues are tried for the purpose of deciding whether the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.