Escher

Perries Irr. Dist. v. Escher

Good Law
132 C.C.A. 78·215 F. 566·1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1267
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 1914No. 2357California51 words

lead Opinion

The question in this case is the same as that in Perris Irrigation District, a Corporation, v. R. B. Turnbull, Administrator of the Estate of R. H. Thompson, Deceased (No. 2356) 215 Fed. 562 , 132 C. C. A. 74 , and, for the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.