Thompson

Thompson v. Pack

Good Law
219 F. 624·1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1360
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1914No. B 46California1,059 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Bledsoe, J.

This matter is before the court on an order to show cause why a temporary injunction, pendente lite, should not issue restraining the defendants from putting of record certain notices of forfeiture, with affidavits of service thereof; such notices being those provided for in section 2324, Revised Statutes of the United States, and section 1426o of the Civil Code of the state of California, with reference to the forfeiting of part interests of mining claims.

[ 1 ] The bill in equity as filed contains much matter that seems to be immaterial, much that is purely “epithetic,” to use an expressive phrase, and a great deal averred upon information and belief, and not positively. With respect to this latter, the court feels that it should not, of course, consider it upon this order to show cause, because of the fact that under the law the complainant, to be entitled to positive relief at this juncture and in advance of a hearing, must base his request for such relief upon positive allegations.

[2] Laying out of consideration, however, the matters referred to above, it may be said that certain facts are stated with such positiveness and cogency as that they fall within the realm of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.