United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Good Law
220 F. 215·1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1707
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1915California1,504 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Bledsoe, J.

This is an action tried before and submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. The plaintiff-asks for a judgment of $100, as against the defendant, because of an alleged violation of the Safety Appliance Act of Congress, in that the said defendant hauled on its line of railroad, over a part of a through highway of interstate commerce, a certain freight car, which said freight car was out of repair, in that the uncoupling chain on one end of said car was disconnected from the coupler, thus necessitating a man going between the ends of the cars to couple or uncouple them.

In the agreed statement of facts, among other things not material to a determination of the cause, it is stipulated that the railway of the defendant is, and was, efficiently managed and operated in accord with the best-known custom and usage prevailing among well-operated railways ; that in the city of San Diego, wherein the alleged violation of the Safety Appliance Act occurred, a certain transfer track, upon which was situate the car in question, was a little over one mile distant from a certain track known as the “D street repair track,” which latter track was set apart and used for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.