Rininger

Rininger v. Puget Sound Electric Ry.

Good Law
136 C.C.A. 43·220 F. 419·1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 1915No. 2450California1,610 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ross, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error to recover damages resulting to them from the death of the husband of Nellie M. and the father of Helen Dorothy Rininger, which was in the complaint alleged to have been caused by the joint negligence of the defendants in error. The deceased Rininger was killed by a car of the defendant electric railway — an interurban road — colliding with an automobile in which he was riding. Both companies were represented in the court below by the same counsel.

*420 [1] At the trial, upon the conclusion of all of the evidence on the part of the plaintiffs, the defendant Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Company moved the court for judgment in its favor, “on the ground that it had been in no way connected with the ownership or operation or management or control of the interurban railroad, and that no negligence on its part had been shown.” The record shows that that motion was granted as to that defendant without objection, and it was not named in the writ of error or citation, or in any way made a party to the proceedings taken by the plaintiffs in error to review the judgment which was subsequently entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.