Backus

Choy Gum v. Backus

Good Law
139 C.C.A. 35·223 F. 487·1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1735
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 1915No. 2475California2,224 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Wolverton, J.

This cause is here on appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus; a demurrer having been sustained to such petition. The petitioner is a Chinese woman, who is charged with being unlawfully in this country because engaged in practicing prostitution, and is held for deportation upon warrant of the Secretary of Commerce and Labor. The purpose of suing out the writ was to effect her release from such custody.

The alleged illegality of her restraint consists in abuse of discretion by the immigration officers in the examination of the petitioner for deportation, and in failing to render her a fair and impartial hearing, in the following particulars:

(1) ' Incorporating into the record against the petitioner the testimony of Leong Toe, Ton Yook Lan, and Wong Go, and refusing to set a time and place for the examination of said witnesses on behalf of petitioner.

(2) Taking- the testimony of Arthur D. Layne and Dennis Bohle on affidavit against petitioner, without potice to her, and withholding the fact that such testimony had been taken until the final hearing, and embodying the same in the record without affording opportunity tO' her of answering the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.