Pack

In this suit the plaintiff prayed for and obtained an injunction pendente lite, restraining and enjoining. *643 the defendants from in any manner taking any steps towards forfeiting the plaintiffs right, title, and interest in and to 12 certain placer mining claims, particularly set forth and described in the complaint as claims Nos. 68 to 72, inclusive, 87 to 91, inclusive, 111 and 112,.situate upon Searles Borax Bake, San Bernardino county/ Cal.

All of. such claims are included in the 175 claims involved in case No. 2535, 223 Fed. 635 , - C. C. A. -, all thereof in case No. 2536, 223 Fed. 641 ,--C. C. A. -, one thereof (claim No. 70) in case No. 2537, 223 Fed. 645 , -C. C. A. —, and all thereof in case No. 2538, 223 Fed. 638 , - C. C. A. ■ — , The complaint is based upon an alleged notice of forfeiture dated September 14, 1914, and served by the defendants upon the plaintiff, wherein they claim to have expended the sum of $1,200 for assessment work upon the claims for the year 191b, and they demand payment by him to them, of a contribution for such assessment work on the claims alleged to amount to the sum of $150. After the granting of the injunction pendente lite, a motion…