Craig

Power & Irrigation Co. of Clear Lake v. Craig

Good Law
141 C.C.A. 354·226 F. 598·1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2230
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 1915No. 2521California280 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ross, J.

(after stating the facts as above). We think, as did the ¿court below, that the basis of the suit are the contracts set out in the bill, and that as the complainant’s assignors could not, for that reason, bring it in the federal court, neither could the complainant, because of the provisions of the statute above referred to.

The Central Counties Land Company, the California Industrial Com *611 pany, and the Central California Power Company, referred to in the briefs as the “Allied Corporations,” through whom the complainant claims were, according to the averments of the bill, acting in co-operation with Vandercook, who held a contract with certain of the defendants to the suit for the purchase of the stock of the Yolo County Consolidated Water Company — which is the contract of January 19, 1907— alter which, according to the bill, came the incorporation of the Clear Cake Power & Irrigation Company atid the merger agreement. It was to defeat, the rights growing out of the contracts mentioned, in behalf of Vandercook and the Allied Corporations and those holding under them, that the alleged wrongs and frauds on the part of the defendants are alleged to have been done and committed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.