Osterman
Osterman v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.
144 C.C.A. 664·230 F. 1023
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 1916No. 2767California112 words
lead Opinion
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana. L. O. Evans, of Kulte, Mont., W. B. Rodgers, of Anaconda, Mont., and D. Gay Stivers, of Butte, Mont., for defendant in error. On motion of counsel for defendant in error, writ of error dismissed for the noneompliance by the plaintiff in error with the pro visions.of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules of practice of this court ( 150 Fed. xxix , 79 C. C. A. xxix ); the plaintiff in error having foiled to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by said rule.