Smith v. United States

Good Law
145 C.C.A. 213·231 F. 25·1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 1916No. 2576California2,778 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rudkin, J.

The indictment in this case was returned undef section 37 of the federal Penal Code of 1909. Act March 4, 1909, c. 321, 35 Stat. 1096 (Comp. St. 1913, § 10201). The charging part of the indictment, omitting mere formal parts and the overt acts, reads as follows:

Eight defendants were originally named in the indictment. The defendant J ohn L. Howard died during the trial; the defendants Sidney V. Smith, Robert Bruce, and Joseph L. Schmitt were acquitted by direction of the court; the defendant Edward J. Smith was found not guilty by the jury, and a verdict of guilty was returned against the three remaining defendants, James B. Smith, F. C. Mills, and E. H. Mayer. To reverse the. judgment entered on this verdict the present writ of error was sued out.

The Western Fuel Company was incorporated during the latter part of the year 1902, and ever since its incorporation has been extensively engaged in the business of mining, importing, buying, and selling fuel coals. The company owns and operates mines at Namaino and Northfield, British Columbia, but its principal place of búsiness has been San Francisco, Cal. The plaintiff in error Smith was vice president and general manager of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.